Saturday, 4th February 2012

Religious leaders slams Hawking’s theory

Posted on 04. Sep, 2010 by in Headlines, World

London, England– “God did not create the universe” were the words of British physicist Stephen Hawking in his new book “The Grand Design.” Leaders of different religious background joined forces and lambasted his work.

In his recent book, Britain’s most famous scientist claimed that God had no role in the creation of the universe. “Given the existence of gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing,” explains the 68 year old paraplegic physicist.  “Spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,” according to an excerpt printed in the Times of London.

Hawking also wrote “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper [fuse] and set the universe going.”

The published excerpt immediately drawn lots of attention particularly people from the religious sectors. Religious leaders were quick to hit back at Hawking’s statement . Dr. Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the head of the Church of England told reporters that “physics on its own will not settle the question of why there is something rather than nothing.”

“Belief in God is not about just plugging a gap in explaining how one thing relates to another within the Universe. It is the belief that there is an intelligent, living agent on whose activity everything ultimately depends for its existence.” added Williams.

Hawking’s writings also raised Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks eyebrows. He wrote to the Times saying “Science is about explanation. Religion is about interpretation…The Bible simply isn’t interested in how the Universe came into being.”

Leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales and the Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols also criticized Hawking’s viewpoint and supported Sacks idea : “I totally endorse what the Chief Rabbi said so eloquently about the relationship between religion and science.”

Leaders from across the religious spectrum were one in debunking Hawking’s theory. Ibrahim Mogra, committee chairman at the Muslim Council of Britain and an imam, told the Times ” If we look at the Universe and all that has been created, it indicates that somebody has been here to bring it into existence. That somebody is the almighty conqueror.”

Meanwhile, even the physicist’s colleagues at the University of Cambridge in England seemed to disagree. They accused him of “missing the point”.  ”The ‘god’ that he is trying to debunk is not the creator God of the Abrahamic faiths who really is the ultimate explanation for why there is something rather than nothing,” explains the director of the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion Denis Alexander.

“Hawking’s god is a god-of-the-gaps used to plug present gaps in our scientific knowledge. Science provides us with a wonderful narrative as to how (existence may happen, but theology addresses the meaning of the narrative,” adds Alexander.

The Times mainly published an excerpt from the book. It did not help that the excerpt used too technical quantum physics terms such as vibrating string, two-dimensional membranes, blobs, etc… He doesn’t really elaborate his theory in the excerpt, which is the introduction to the book.

Hawkings, however, said that he understands the sentiment of fellow English scientist Sir Isaac Newton when he said God did “create” and “conserve” order in the universe.

Tags: ,

One Response to “Religious leaders slams Hawking’s theory”

  1. Ron Krumpos 28 September 2011 at 4:02 am #

    In “The Grand Design” Stephen Hawking postulates that the M-theory may be the Holy Grail of physics…the Grand Unified Theory which Einstein had tried to formulate but never completed. It expands on quantum mechanics and string theories.

    In my free ebook on comparative mysticism, “the greatest achievement in life,” is a quote by Albert Einstein: “…most beautiful and profound emotion we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and most radiant beauty – which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their primitive form – this knowledge, this feeling, is at the center of all religion.”

    E=mc², Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, is probably the best known scientific equation. I revised it to help better understand the relationship between divine Essence (Love, Grace, Spirit), matter (mass/energy: visible/dark) and consciousness (f(x) raised to its greatest power). Unlike the speed of light, which is a constant, there are no exact measurements for consciousness. In this hypothetical formula, basic consciousness may be of insects, to the second power of animals and to the third power the rational mind of humans. The fourth power is suprarational consciousness of mystics, when they intuit the divine essence in perceived matter. This was a convenient analogy, but there cannot be a divine formula.


Leave a Reply

We welcome your comments and questions here. Please remember to be courteous and respectful. Please fill the required box or you can’t comment at all. Your e-mail address will not be published.

Gravatar is supported. If you don't have one, you may sign up here.

All comments are held for moderation, no exceptions. It's just to ensure that the threads stay clean and free of spam.

Always put in mind that if a source continually posts questionable content, he or she will be banned from this website. Readers that identify stories that are questionable are encouraged to notify us about the problem.